The previous assignments focused on domestic matters in US history. This last assignment explores Americaâ€™s international role in recent decades. By the mid-20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United Statesâ€™ military functions as the worldâ€™s â€œpolice.â€ This assignment covers the manner in which this shift occurred and the consequences the United States faces as a result of its status as â€œpoliceman of the world.â€ One can identify early steps this direction well before World War II, but in this paper focus on the period from the 1940s to the present. Take one of the positions as suggested below, draw from the sources listed, and present a paper with specific examples and arguments to demonstrate the validity of your position.
Possible positionâ€”in each case you can take the pro or con position:
- The American â€œpolicingâ€ role developed because of the Cold War, but it became primarily a means for protecting and assisting economic interests for itself and its allies as illustrated by recent events as well as earlier ones.
- The American â€œpolicingâ€ role has been exercised primarily to protect vulnerable peoples and regions from powerful oppressors or from regional chaos, as illustrated by recent events as well as earlier ones.
- The American â€œpolicingâ€ role has had noble intentions and ultimate success during the Cold War, but in fighting terror it has gotten off track with some severe consequences.
- A position you develop on this issue with the approval of your instructor.
After giving general consideration to your readings and your research, select one of the positions above as your positionâ€”your thesis. (Sometimes after doing more thorough research, you might choose the reverse position. This happens with critical thinking and inquiry. Your final paper might end up taking a different position than you originally envisioned.) Organize your paper as follows, handling these issues:
- The position you choose (from the list above)â€”or something close to itâ€”will be the thesis statement in your opening paragraph.
- To support your position, use four specific examples from different decades between 1950 and the present. (At least one example must be from the last ten years).
- Explain why the opposing view is weak in comparison to yours.
- Consider your life today: In what way does the history you have shown shape or impact issues in your workplace or desired profession? (This might be unclear at first since it is foreign policy. But, super-power status does inevitably provide advantages in a global economy. You must use aâ€¯MINIMUM of fourâ€¯quality academic sources; the Schultz textbook must be one of them.â€¯Two of them must come from the online libraryâ€”either those library sources listed or others.â€¯Your other source should be drawn from the list provided below.â€¯Some sources are â€œprimaryâ€ sources from the time period being studied. Some sources below can be accessed via direct link. For others, they areâ€¯accessible throughâ€¯the Library tab to the left of the screen in Blackboardâ€”once in there, you may do a â€œkeywordâ€â€¯searchâ€¯of the article title.â€¯APA Reference for the textbook – Schultz, Kevin M. (2018). HIST5: Volume 2: U.S. History Since 1865 (Student edition). Boston: Cengage. Bush, G. H. W. (1991, March 6).â€¯Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Cessation of theâ€¯Persian Gulf Conflict.â€¯Retrieved fromâ€¯http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/bushnwo.htmlâ€¯â€¯
- Dulles, J. F. (1954, Jan. 12). Secretary Dullesâ€™ Strategy of Massive Retaliation.â€¯Department of Stateâ€¯â€¯Bulletin, XXX, 107-110.â€¯Retrieved fromâ€¯http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/dulles.htmlâ€¯
- Klare, M. (2002, July 15). Endless Military Superiority.â€¯Nation,â€¯275(3),â€¯12-16.â€¯
- Paul, C. (2008).â€¯Marines on the Beach:â€¯The Politics of U.S. Military Intervention Decision Making.â€¯eBook.â€¯Westport, Conn: Greenwood Publishingâ€¯Group.
- Powell, C. (2003, Feb. 6).â€¯Transcript ofâ€¯Powellsâ€™ UN presentation.â€¯CNN.com.â€¯Retrievedâ€¯fromâ€¯http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.powell.transcript/â€¯â€¯
- Reagan, R. (1983, Mar. 8). Remarks at the Annual Convention of the National Association of Evangelicals.â€¯Retrieved fromâ€¯http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/evilemp.html
- Schultz, Kevin M. (2014)â€¯HIST: Volume 2: U.S. history since 1865 (3rdâ€¯ed.). University of Illinois atâ€¯ Chicago: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Tarzi, S. M. (2014, Sept.).â€¯The Folly of a grand strategy of coercive global primacy:â€¯A fresh perspectiveâ€¯onâ€¯the post-9/11 Bush doctrine.â€¯International Journal on World Peace,â€¯31(3),â€¯27-52.